Quarter
Firm
Composite — Flagship
Period Performance
Benchmark Comparison
Annual Returns
Risk Metrics — Trailing 3-Year
Tail-Risk & Drawdown Forensics
Required Disclosures
Attestation
Factor Health ⓘ
Rolling 6-Month IC Table
Top collinear factor pairs (|r| ≥ 0.7)
Archive candidates (sustained low IC)
Methodology — factor orthogonalization · Findings (2026-04-28)
Methodology & rigor
GIPS-aligned composite: returns computed time-weighted (TWR) using daily revaluation per GIPS 2020 §3.A.6. Geometric linking for periods > 1 year. Composite construction follows §4 (single composite per investment strategy, all discretionary fee-paying portfolios included).
Risk metrics: annualized volatility = std-dev of daily returns × √252. Sharpe = (annualized return − Rf) / annualized vol, Rf = 90-day T-bill yield (FRED DGS3MO). Max DD computed peak-to-trough on the cumulative return series.
Benchmarks: S&P 500 Total Return for equity composites; Bloomberg US Aggregate for bond composites; CFA Institute "GIPS Provisions for Asset Owners" for non-traditional composites.
Cryptographic attestation: SHA-256 hash of the entire presentation, chained to the prior quarter. Anyone can re-hash the displayed JSON and verify against the on-chain record.
Limitations: research presentation only — no third-party GIPS verifier engaged; performance attribution at the factor level is on the per-security pages, not aggregated here; no client-account performance shown (firm-only research book).
Sources: CFA Institute "Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS®) 2020", FRED DGS3MO (3-month T-bill yield), Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index methodology.
See: AI & methodology hub · Scoring Model Card · Calibration card